I drew a blank when deciding on what to write today, leaving it until 21:05. It’s probably because I had something on my mind that I don’t believe I’m equipped to write about – maybe because I’m young? Perhaps because I’m shockingly bad with expressing myself in my own voice.
Lord Byron
“For truth is always strange; stranger than fiction”
I often wonder about that; about how many authors, writers, poets and artists there are – Arguably there is not a single person alive that doesn’t fit into one of those categories of people. Perhaps excluding the illiterate but that is a whole separate discussion. I wonder which of them write or express in their own voice, character, essence. Sometimes, one just knows, it’s obvious in its authenticity; the autobiography (barring ghostwriters, of course), the heartfelt love poem (barring Lord Byron’s ‘Fare Thee Well’), or the eponymous author surrogate. Albeit, on reflection I can see a flaw being that authors write what their audience wants, it’s still likely the intention of such literature and art is to reflect their own voice. Sometimes, one must say, not awfully well.
My point being, it isn’t very straightforward whether or not someone’s expression is truly reflective of their perspective. We simply have to assume, or choose, which work feels true – which work feels like it was felt. Yet, even then, the assumption can (and will) be skewed based on our own experiences, essentially rendering the burden of an authentic reading on us, not the author. Having said that, one does realise when a writer hasn’t got authenticity or their own voice – but it’s entirely possible I’m just reading them wrong. That is why I keep wondering; because there is no sufficient answer to what I want to know, and I do want to know it so desperately. How can I tell who is expressing their own voice and who is not? And how, remembering humans are flawed, do I know whether I’m right and you are wrong? My whole being would swear by Emily Bronte’s voice being her own but my dear friend avers the contrary – “Bronte’s a mere Romantic wannabe” she’d likely say. What exactly makes her right and me wrong?
Finding issues with the subjective perception of authenticity seems counterproductive for the literature student. Surely I should know language, literature and essentially all art to not be black and white – unless visually, indeed. However, I find my issues with this topic can serve as my own personal reminder to assess what I create, and by default who I am, and continue to present my own voice when I intend it.
That leads me on to my final thought quite well. Sometimes authenticity is unnecessary. Writing from/painting from/creating from another perspective is often essential. Historical realism comes to mind and, for reasons I don’t quite know, King Lear specifically enters my thoughts – Shakespeare was not blind but the emotional pleas of Gloucester after having his eyes gauged out has a raw quality because Shakespeare was an incredible bard and playwright. It’s poor writers that can’t create alternative perspectives. Particularly, it’s poor writers with lacking empathy that can’t produce a variety of point of views.
Having written this out I am still frustrated that there seems to be no resolution to the pressing question, “Whose voice is this?”, but I can rest easy if I convince myself that I am the one who is right. Maybe I’ll try to remember that I can (sometimes, rarely) be wrong (I’m only half joking) but please don’t point it out – my ego can’t take it, nor could Byron’s.